Value at Risk estimation using GAS models with heavy tailed distributions for cryptocurrencies
Keywords:Cryptocurrency, GAS, Generalised Lambda Distribution, Value at Risk
Risk management and prediction of market losses of cryptocurrencies are of notable value to risk managers, portfolio managers, financial market researchers and academics. One of the most common measures of an asset’s risk is Value-at-Risk (VaR). This paper evaluates and compares the performance of generalized autoregressive score (GAS) combined with heavy-tailed distributions, in estimating the VaR of two well-known cryptocurrencies’ returns, namely Bitcoin returns and Ethereum returns. In this paper, we proposed a VaR model for Bitcoin and Ethereum returns, namely the GAS model combined with the generalized lambda distribution (GLD), referred to as the GAS-GLD model. The relative performance of the GAS-GLD models was compared to the models proposed by Troster et al. (2018), in other words, GAS models combined with asymmetric Laplace distribution (ALD), the asymmetric Student’s t-distribution (AST) and the skew Student’s t-distribution (SSTD). The Kupiec likelihood ratio test was used to assess the adequacy of the proposed models. The principal findings suggest that the GAS models with heavy-tailed innovation distributions are, in fact, appropriate for modelling cryptocurrency returns, with the GAS-GLD being the most adequate for the Bitcoin returns at various VaR levels, and both GAS-SSTD, GAS-ALD and GAS-GLD models being the most appropriate for the Ethereum returns at the VaR levels used in this study.
Ardia, D., Bluteau, K., & Ru ?ede, M. (2019). Regime changes in Bitcoin GARCH volatility dynamics. Finance Research Letters, 29(C), 266-271. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.frl.2018.08.009
Ardia, D., Boudt, K., & Catania, L. (2018). Downside risk evaluation with the R Package GAS. The R Journal, 10(2), 410-421. http://dx.doi.org/10.32614/RJ-2018-064
Bouoiyour, J., Selmi, R., Tiwari, A., & Olayeni, O. (2016). What drives Bitcoin price? Economics Bulletin, 36, 843-850.
Catania, L., & Grassi, S. (2017). Modelling Cryptocurrencies Financial Time Series. SSRN Electronic Journal.
Chalabi Y., Scott, D.J., & Wuertz, D. (2012). Flexible distribution modelling with the generalized lambda distribution. MPRA Paper No. 43333.
Chan, S., Chu, J., Nadarajah, S., & Osterrieder, J. (2017). A Statistical Analysis of Cryptocurrencies. Journal of Risk and Financial Management 10(2), 12. https://doi.org/10.3390/jrfm10020012
Christoffersen, P. (1998). Evaluating interval forecasts. International Economic Review, 39(4): 841-862.
Chu, J., Chan, S., Nadarajah, S., & Osterrieder, J. (2017). Volatility estimation for Bitcoin: A comparison of GARCH models. Journal of Risk and Financial Management 11, 23. https://doi.org/10.3390/jrfm10040017
Conrad, C., Custovic, A., & Ghysels, E. (2018). Volatility estimation for Bitcoin: A comparison of GARCH models. Journal of Risk and Financial Management, 11, 23.
Corrado, C.J. (2001). Option Pricing Based on the Generalized Lambda Distribution. Journal of Futures Market. http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.248696
Creal, D., Koopman, S.J., & Lucas, A. (2013). Generalized autoregressive score models with applications. Journal of Applied Econometrics, 28, 777-795. https://doi.org/10.1002/jae.1279
Duffie, D., & Pan, J. (1997). An Overview of Value at Risk. Testing for unit roots: An empirical investigation, 4(3), 7-49. https://doi.org/10.3905/jod.1997.407971
Dyhrberg, A. (2015). Bitcoin, gold and the dollar – A GARCH volatility analysis. Finance Research Letters, 16, 223-236. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.frl.2015.10.008
Engle, R. F., & Russell, J.R. (1998). Autoregressive Conditional Duration: A New Model for Irregularly Spaced Transaction Data. Econometrica 66(5), 1127-1162. https://doi.org/10.2307/2999632
Jorion, P., (2000). Value at Risk: The New Benchmark for Managing Financial Risk.
Katsiampa, P. (2017). Volatility estimation for Bitcoin: A comparison of GARCH models. Economics Letters 158(C), 3-6. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.econlet.2017.06.023
Kotz, S., Kozubowski, T.J. & Podgórski, K. (2001) Asymmetric Multivariate Laplace Distribution. In: The Laplace Distribution and Generalizations. Birkhäuser, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4612-0173-1_7
Kupiec, P. (1995). Techniques for verifying the accuracy of risk measurement models.
Journal of Derivatives, 2, 173-184. https://doi.org/10.3905/jod.1995.407942
Liu, R., Shao, Z., Wei, G., & Wang, W. (2017). Volatility estimation for Bitcoin: A comparison of GARCH models. Journal of Accounting, Business and Finance Research, 1, 71-75. https://doi.org/10.20448/2002.11.71.75.
Marcellino, M. (2006). Leading Indicators. Handbook of Economic Forecasting, 1, 879-960. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1574-0706(05)01016-5
Ramberg, J. S., & Schmeiser, B. W., (1974). An approximate method for generating asymmetric random variables. Commun. ACM 17(2), 78–82. https://doi.org/10.1145/360827.360840
Sapuric, S. & Kokkinaki, A. (2014). Bitcoin Is Volatile! Isn’t that Right? Lecture Notes in Business Information Processing 183:255-265. Conference: International Conference on Business Information Systems. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-11460-6_22
Takaishi, T. (2018). Statistical properties and multifractality of Bitcoin. Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications 506. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physa.2018.04.046
Troster, V., Tiwari, A.K., Shahbaz, M., & Macedo, D.N. (2018). Bitcoin returns and risk: A general GARCH and GAS analysis. Finance Research Letters. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.frl.2018.09.01
How to Cite
Copyright (c) 2021 International Journal of Finance & Banking Studies (2147-4486)
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
Authors contributing to IJFBS agree to publish their articles under the Creative Commons Attribution- 4.0 NC license, allowing third parties to share their work (copy, distribute, transmit) and to adapt it, under the condition that the authors are given credit, that the work is not used for commercial purposes, and that in the event of reuse or distribution, the terms of this license are made clear. Authors retain copyright of their work, with first publication rights granted to IJFBS. However, authors are required to transfer copyrights associated with commercial use to the Publisher. The authors agree to the terms of this Copyright Notice, which will apply to this submission if and when it is published by this journal
Submission of an article implies that the work described has not been published previously( exceptin the form of an abstract or as part of a published lecture or academic thesis), that it is not under consideration for publication elsewhere, that its publication is approved by all authors and tacitly or explicitly by the responsible authorities where the work was carried out, and that, if accepted, it will not be published elsewhere in the same form, in English or in any other languages, without the written consent of the Publisher. The Editors reserve the right to edit or otherwise alter all contributions, but authors will receive proofs for approval before publication