Well-being capital and government’s intervention to dam’s affected residents: Pak Mun Dam, Thailand

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.20525/ijrbs.v10i4.1217

Keywords:

multidimensional well-being, Pak Mun Dam, sustainable, development

Abstract

Government plays an important role as a well-being capital provider through policies, strategies, or even direct provision to local residents to improve their livelihoods. Pak Mun Dam is one of the most controversial dams in Thailand, and government intervention is needed to solve the issues the dam has created. This study tests the premise that government intervention will impact overall well-being only through structural means by providing strategy and policies related to social and economic well-being. Government training programs and government services will impact over all well-being through social well-being. A satisfactory solution to the Pak Mun Dam situation will impact overall well-being through economic well-being. In this study a number of items, related to different well-being dimensions, were examined. The findings suggest that appropriate policy must address the four significant items which surfaced in the economic well-being measure and ten items in the social well-being dimension.

References

Amornsakchai, S., P. Annez, S. Vongvisessomjai, S. Choowaew. (2000). Pak Mun Dam, Mekong River Basin, Thailand: A WCD Case Study prepared as an input to the World Commission on Dams.

Cahyat, A., Gönner, C., & Haug, M. (2007). Assessing household poverty and wellbeing a manual with examples from kutai barat, Indonesia. Bogor Barat, Indonesia. Center for International Forestry Research.

Chaiyamart, P., Gartner, W., & Carlson, S. (2021a). Pak Mun Dam’s long term impact on local residents’ livelihood. International Journal of Research in Business and Social Science (2147- 4478), 10(3), 391–402. https://doi.org/10.20525/ijrbs.v10i3.1138

Chaiyamart, P., Gartner, W., & delMas, R. (2021b). Multidimensional well-being of residents affected by the Pak Mun Dam, Thailand. International Journal of Research in Business and Social Science (2147- 4478), 10(2), 261–269. https://doi.org/10.20525/ijrbs.v10i2.1057

Chambers, R. and Conway, R. (1992). Sustainable rural livelihoods: Practical concepts for the 21st century. IDS discussion paper, No. 296. pp.127-130.

Collier P., Guillaumont P Chambers, R. and Conway, R. (1992). Sustainable rural livelihoods: Practical concepts for the 21st century. IDS discussion paper, No. 296. pp.127-130.., Guillaumont Jeanneney S. and J.W. Gunning (1997),« Redisigning Conditionality », World Development, vol. 25, n°9, p.1399-1407.

Futterman-Collier, A.D., Sadao, K., Otto, C., & Polloi, A. (1997). Perceptions of the social, cultural, and psychological well-being in Palau. Pacific Health Dialog, 4 (1), 28-34.

Crisp, R., 2006, Reasons and the Good, Oxford: Clarendon Press

Deneulin, S., & McGregor, J. A. (2010). The capability approach and the politics of a social conception of wellbeing. European Journal of Social Theory, 13(4), 501–519. https://doi.org/10.1177/1368431010382762

Gasper, D. (2002) Is Sen's Capability Approach an Adequate Basis for Considering Human Development, Review of Political Economy, 14:4, 435-461, https://doi.org/10.1080/0953825022000009898

Guisan, M.C., 2009. "Government Effectiveness, Education, Economic Development And Well-Being: Analysis Of European Countries In Comparison With The United States And Canada, 2000-2007," Applied Econometrics and International Development, Euro-American Association of Economic Development, vol. 9(1).

Hu, L.-t., & Bentler, P. M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling, 6(1), 1–55. https://doi.org/10.1080/10705519909540118

Kahneman, Daniel, Alan B. Krueger, David A. Schkade, Norbert Schwarz & Arthur A. Stone. (2004). A Survey Method for Characterizing Daily Life Experience: The Day Reconstruction Method. Science, 306(5702), 1776–780.

Keyes (2006). Keyes CL. Mental health in adolescence: is America's youth flourishing? Am J Orthopsychiatry, 276(3):395-402. doi: 10.1037/0002-9432.76.3.395. PMID: 16981819.

Kiguchi, Y. (2016). Pak Mun Dam 25 years after world bank’s loan, problems remain. Environmental Justice, http://www.mekongcommons.org/author/yuka-kiguchi/

Knight, J. & Gunatilka, R. (2012). Income, aspirations and the Hedonic Treadmill in a poor society, Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 82(1), 67-81.

Lobao, Linda M., and Gregory Hooks. 2003. "Public Employment, Social Welfare and Local Well-Being: Does a Lean and Mean Government Benefit the Masses?" Social Forces 81 (December):519-556.

Manorom, K. & Maneephong, T. (2006). Bot Samruat Sathanaphap Ngan Wichai Thang Sangkhomwihaya Nai Phak-Isaan Rawang Pho So 2543-2546 [A Survey of Sociological Research in Isaan, 2000–2003]. Ubon Ratchathani: MSSRC, Ubon Ratchathani University.

MacCallum, R. C., Browne, M. W., & Sugawara, H. M. (1996). Power analysis and determination of sample size for covariance structure modeling. Psychological Methods, 1(2), 130–149. https://doi.org/10.1037/1082-989X.1.2.130

Murphy (2010). Explanation in psychiatry. Philosophy compass, 5(7), 516-623. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1747-9991.2010.00304.x

Olson, D. (1999). Empirical Approaches to Family Assessment. The Journal of Family Therapy.

Osberg, L., & Sharpe, A. (2003). Human Well-being and Economic Well-being: What Values Are Implicit in Current Indices? CSLS Research Reports.

Oishi, S., Diener, E. F., Lucas, R. E., & Suh, E. M. (1999). Cross-cultural variations in predictors of life satisfaction: Perspectives from needs and values. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 25(8), 980–990. https://doi.org/10.1177/01461672992511006

Phongam(2005). Discourse of Pak Mun Dam. http://newtdc.thailis.or.th/docview.aspx?tdcid=381809

Prawitz, A. D., Garman, E. T., Sorhaindo, B., O'Neill, B., Kim, J., & Drentea, P. (2006). In charge Financial Distress/Financial Well-Being Scale: Development, Administration, and Score Interpretation. Financial Counseling and Planning, 17(1), 34–50.

Rahman, T. & Mittelhammer, R., & Wandschneider, P. (2003). A Sensitivity Analysis Of Quality Of Life Indices Across Countries, 2003 Annual meeting, July 27-30, Montreal, Canada 22045, American Agricultural Economics Association (New Name 2008: Agricultural and Applied Economics Association).

Rishi, P. & Khuntia, G. (2012). Urban Environmental Stress and Behavioral Adaptation in Bhopal City of India. Urban Studies Research 2012(2).

Smith, L., and J. K. Summers. 2011. Application of the human well-being index to tribal communities. National EPA-Tribal Science Council (TSC) Fall 2011 Meeting (Catoosa, Oklahoma, USA, 2011) US Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, D.C., USA.

Waldron, S. (2010). Measuring Subjective Wellbeing in the UK. Newport: Office for National Statistics

Downloads

Published

2021-06-14

How to Cite

Chaiyamart, P., Gartner, W. ., & Nelson, K. . (2021). Well-being capital and government’s intervention to dam’s affected residents: Pak Mun Dam, Thailand. International Journal of Research in Business and Social Science (2147- 4478), 10(4), 288–301. https://doi.org/10.20525/ijrbs.v10i4.1217

Issue

Section

Interdisciplinary Studies in Humanities & Social Sciences