A legal protection for domestic well-known mark on impersonation of different kind of goods under Indonesia’s trademark law
PDF

Keywords

Legal Protection, Domestic Well-Known Mark, Impersonation, Trademark Law

How to Cite

Murbiantoro, A., Safa’at, R., Yuliati, Y., & Sukarmi, S. (2020). A legal protection for domestic well-known mark on impersonation of different kind of goods under Indonesia’s trademark law. International Journal of Research in Business and Social Science (2147- 4478), 9(4), 444-450. https://doi.org/10.20525/ijrbs.v9i4.766

Abstract

Indonesia’s trademark law does not provide provision for legal protection to registered mark which is well-known domestically therefore, there is no legal basis in case there is another party to commit in impersonation the said registered mark in the different kind of goods. On the other hand, protection indicates the address of international well-known marks only. Referring to the trademark law regime which is common universally such as can be found in the Paris Convention and TRIPs Agreement. Otherwise, for impersonation in different kinds of goods, the protection is given for a well- known mark only.  However, the said mark must be recognized within the territory where the mark is called as well-known such in certain countries. The purpose of this study is to know the legal protection for the domestic well-known mark on impersonation of different kind of goods under Indonesia’s trademark law. This study is normative legal research with legislation, concept, and comparative approach. The legal material with technical analysis is done by the method of interpretation. Results of this study, The regulation of legal protection for registered trademark owners of impersonation of different kinds of goods should be reregulated (a reformulation of provisions).  So that which is a well-known trademark can be in the form of domestic and internationally well-known, therefore the requirements for registration and commercializing of a mark in several countries, not as an obligation to obtain the rights and status become a well-known mark. However, when a mark is factually known and used in Indonesia, the wide scope of international well-known is no need as a mandatory.

 

https://doi.org/10.20525/ijrbs.v9i4.766
PDF

References

Ball, E. (2016).Trademark Owners May Find Dilution Claims Out of Reach, Fenwick & Wess LLP, Almost Famous.

Gunawati. A. (2015). Perlindungan Merek Terkenal Barang dan Jasa Tidak Sejenis Terhadap Persaingan Usaha Tidak Sehat. Malang. Briwijaya University.

Janed, R. (2006). Penyalahgunaan Hak Eksklusif Hak Kekayaan Intelektual. Surabaya. Airlangga University.

LaFrance, M. (2011).Passing Off and Unfair Competition: Conflict and Convergence in Competition Law. Scholarly Works. 784. https://scholars.law.unlv.edu/facpub/784.

Mark D. Robins (2004). Actual Confusion in Trademark Infringement Litigation: Restraining Subjectivity Through A Factor-Based Approach to Valuing Evidence, 2 Nw. J. Tech. & Intell. Prop. 1 https://scholarlycommons.law.northwestern.edu/njtip/vol2/iss2/1.

Marzuki,P.M. (2011). Penelitian Hukum, Jakarta: Kencana Prenada Media Group.

Medina, S., Husni, A, & Sili, E.B. (2018). Legal Protection Of Famous Brand "Hugo Boss" (Study Of Supreme Court Decision NO. 92 / K /PDT.SUS.HKI / 2017). International Journal of Humanities, Religion and Social Science, 2(6), 49-63. http://www.doarj.org/ijhrss/wp-content/uploads/2018/IJHRSS/06/5.pdf

Mercuro, N. & Steven G. Medema. (1996). Economics and the Law From Posner to Post-Modernism. New jersey, Princeton University Press.

McCarthy, J. T. (1996). McCarthy on trademarks and unfair competition (Vol. 1). Clark Boardman Callaghan.

Ong, B. (2005). ProtectingWell-Known Trade Marks: Perspsective from Singapore. INTA: The Law Journal of the International Trademark Association, November-December, Vol. 95 TMR. No. 6. 1221-1272. https://www.inta.org/TMR/Documents/Volume%2095/vol95_no6_a4.pdf.

Praniasari, L. (2018). Legal Analysis Of The Trademark Registration Gayo Coffee Mountain As A Geographical Indication Products In Indonesia. Yogyakarta, Universitas Islam Indonesia. https://dspace.uii.ac.id/handle/123456789/10399

Rahadjo, S. (2000). Ilmu Hukum. Bandung: Citra Aditya Bhakti.

Sari, A.G. & Bramantyo, R.Y. (2020). Legal Practices In Trademark Violation And Protection Of Local Companies In Indonesia. Journal of Xi'an University of Architecture & Technology, 11(3), 3542-3550. http://www.xajzkjdx.cn/gallery/305-mar2020.pdf

Sommers, Mark. (1999). Taking an Aggressive Stance Against Counterfeiters: An Overview of Trademark Counterfeiting Litigation under the Lanham Act, September/October.

Walker, Jeremy T. (2017). Beware of Facilitating Counterfeiting and Trademark Infringement. Published in NH Bar News.

Hermansyah, N. (2009). Metodologi Penelitian dan Penulisan Hukum, Banjarmasin, STIH-SA Press.

Internet

Cornell Law School, Trademark infringement. Available at https://www.law.cornell.edu/wex/trademark_infringement Accessed on January 2019.

International Trademark Association, Trademark Dilution (Intended for a non-legal audience). (2017). Available athttps://www.inta.org/TrademarkBasics/FactSheets/Pages/Trademark-Dilution-(Intended-for-a-non-legal-audience).aspx. Accessed on January 2019.

International (Nice) Classification of Goods and Services, Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia, Available at https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/International_(Nice)_Classification_of_Goods_and_Services, Accessed on February 2020.

Wellknown trademark criteria in malaysia and japan. Available at https://open.mitchellhamline.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1142&context=fach. Accessed on January 2019.

United States Paten and Trademark office (USPTO), Well-known marks Available athttps://www.uspto.gov/ip-policy/trademark-policy/well-known-marks, Accessed on November 2019.

Word Intellectual Property Organization (WIPO). Available at www.wipo.int. Accessed on February 2020.

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.