The reconstruction of rehabilitation for addictives and drug abuses in human rights perspective
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.20525/ijrbs.v11i1.1683Keywords:
rehabilitation, narcotics, human rights.Abstract
Efforts to prevent, protect and save the Indonesian people from the abuse of Narcotics as intended by The Law Number 35 of 2009 concerning Narcotics are carried out through rehabilitation. The rehabilitation can release users from dependence and reduce the danger of disease for addicts and victims of abuse. The existence of rehabilitation is essentially the protection of human life and basic rights to health. It is in accordance with human values ??and legal objectives, namely to provide justice, benefit and legal certainty. These values ??are the basis for consideration that rehabilitation needs to be mandatory for addicts and victims of narcotics abusers. The overcoming narcotics crime by imposing imprisonment on addicts and victims of narcotics abuse certainly cannot break the chain of narcotics abuse. However, in practice, not all addicts and victims of narcotics abusers receive rehabilitation sanctions. The majority of the demands of the public prosecutor against the defendant are imprisonment, and only a few are demanding the imposition of rehabilitation, as well as the judge's decision. This is the evidence that the public prosecutor rarely demands rehabilitation for narcotics defendants. The existence of legal counsel and expert testimony is seen significant in influencing the judge to give a rehabilitation decision. This study will discuss on: 1) Analysis of judge's decisions for addicts and victims of narcotics abusers and 2) Reconstruction of rehabilitation arrangements in the narcotics law in the future. This research is normative juridical research examining various regulations regarding rehabilitation for addicts and victims of narcotics abusers as well as court decisions related to this problem. The legal materials used are analyzed qualitatively and presented in an analytical descriptive manner.
Downloads
References
Apriliyanto, H. P., & Sulchan, A. (2021). Implementation of Diversion against Criminal Conduct of Narcotics Conducted by Children. Law Development Journal, 3(1), 52-60.
Arimuladi, S. U., Utama, Y. J., & Asmara, T. (2021). Protection of human rights for narcotics users: A critique of the use of criminal sanctions in efforts to eradicate the spread of narcotics in Indonesia. Journal of Drug and Alcohol Research, 10(7), 23-31.
Ariyanti, V. (2017). The victims of drugs abuse and their legal status in the Indonesian narcotics law. International Journal of Business, Economics and Law, 13(4), 119-123.
Black, H.C. (1968). Black's Law Dictionary, Minn: West Publishing.
Doyle J., & Ivanovic J. (2010). National Drugs Rehabilitation Framework Document. National Drugs Rehabilitation Implementation Committee. Dublin: Health Services Executive.
Elpina, E., & Purba, M. S. (2021). The Narcotics Abuse Term Weaknesses in Criminal Law Enforcement Of Indonesia. Jurnal Pembaharuan Hukum, 8(1), 34-47.
Faisal, F., Abdullah, A. G., & Sudiro, A. (2020). Legal Discovery of Judges in the Criminal Cases of Narcotic Abuse Based on Law Number 35 of 2009. PalArch's Journal of Archaeology of Egypt/Egyptology, 17(2), 98-106.
Fauzia, A., & Hamdani, F. (2022). Analysis Of The Implementation Of The Non-Conviction-Based Concept In The Practice Of Asset Recovery Of Money Laundering Criminal Act In Indonesia From The Perspective Of Presumption Of Innocence. Jurnal Jurisprudence, 11(1), 57-67.
Hartoko, B. R., & Ma’ruf, U. (2018). Controversy of Criminal Sanctions Against Narcotics Abuser in Act No. 35 of 2009. Jurnal Daulat Hukum, 1(4), 965-972.
Ikawati, L. (2021). Reconstruction of Criminal Sanction Regulations against Narcotic Abusers Not Related To a Drugs Circulation Network Based On Justice Values. Sch Int J Law Crime Justice, 4(10), 588-594.
Lasmadi, S. (2020). Issuance of a Search Warrant for Narcotics Crime in Indonesia. LAW REFORM, 16(1), 45-57.
Malik, F. (2019). Basic Ideas For Determining Death Criminal Threats In Law Number 35 Of 2009 On Narcotics. Ganesha Law Review, 1(1), 27-40.
Marbun, B.N. (1996). Kamus Politik. Jakarta: Pustaka Sinar Harapan.
Massi, M. N., Wahyuni, S., Halik, H., Yusuf, I., Leong, F. J., Dick, T., & Phyu, S. (2011). Drug resistance among tuberculosis patients attending diagnostic and treatment centres in Makassar, Indonesia. The International Journal of Tuberculosis and Lung Disease, 15(4), 489-495.
Nugroho, S. D. (2022). Jur?d?c Rev?ew of Cr?m?nal Sanct?on Formulat?on Aga?nst Cr?m?nal Act?ons of Narcot?cs Based on Pos?t?ve Cr?m?nal Law. Jurnal Hukum Khaira Ummah, 16(4), 1-12.
Susilowati, D., & Harefa, B. (2022). Criminal Liability of Juvenile Narcotics Users. International Journal of Multicultural and Multireligious Understanding, 9(1), 316-324.
Pertiwi, K., & Ainsworth, S. (2021). “Democracy is the Cure?”: Evolving Constructions of Corruption in Indonesia 1994–2014. Journal of Business Ethics, 173(3), 507-523.
Olivia, F., Karim, R., Widarto, J., & Nilasari, I. (2021). Juridicial Review Of The Implimentation Of Rehabilitated Criminal Punishments For Criminal Abuses Of Narcoticts Group I (Sabu)(Case Study Of Central Jakarta District Court Decision Number: 66/Pid. Sus/2018/Pn. Jkt. Pst, Date 8 March 2018). Review of International Geographical Education Online, 11(6), 1477-1487.
Rahardjo, S. (2000). Ilmu Hukum. Bandung: PT Cipta Aditya Bhakti.
Rusito, R., & Suwardi, K. (2019). Development Of Death Penalty In Indonesia In Human Rights Perspective. Ganesha Law Review, 1(2), 38-54.
Setyowati, I. (2018). Sanctions policy in the Indonesian Act. No. 35 of 2009 on narcotics. J Pembaharuan Hukum, 5(55), 10-26532.
Sonjaya, A. (2020). Construction of the rehabilitation model for drug abuse in non-penal criminal policy perspective. Open J. Legal Stud., 3, (111), 1-14.
Susanti, H., Wardani, I. Y., Fitriani, N., & Kurniawan, K. (2022). Exploration the Needs of Nursing Care of Drugs Addiction Service Institutions in Indonesia. Open Access Macedonian Journal of Medical Sciences, 10(G), 45-51.
The Office for Drug Control and Crime Prevention became the United Nations Office on Drugs and Crime. (2003). Drug Abuse Treatment and Rehabilitation:a Practical Planning and Implementation Guide. New York: United Nation.
Wibowo, B. S., Asikin, Z., & Amirudin, A. (2021). Application of Integrated Assessment in Law Enforcement against Narcotics Abusers. International Journal of Multicultural and Multireligious Understanding, 8(4), 422-429.
Zulfa, E.A.. (2011). Pergeseran Paradigma Pemidanaan. Bandung: Lubuk Agung.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2022 Wawan Edi Prastiyo
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
For all articles published in IJRBS, copyright is retained by the authors. Articles are licensed under an open access Creative Commons CC BY 4.0 license, meaning that anyone may download and read the paper for free. In addition, the article may be reused and quoted provided that the original published version is cited. These conditions allow for maximum use and exposure of the work, while ensuring that the authors receive proper credit.
