Readability level of prescribed Accounting textbooks used in South African secondary schools
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.20525/ijrbs.v13i2.3166Keywords:
Readability, Flesch reading ease, Gunning fox index, comprehension, textbooks, AccountingAbstract
The results of a study that investigated the readability of three Accounting textbooks used in South African secondary schools are presented. In South African schools, textbooks remain the primary source of course content that drives the students’ learning of the subject matter. The study followed the traditions of the positivist paradigm. The Flesch reading ease score and Gunning fog index are readability measurement methods that are helpful in measuring the difficulty or challenging nature of text in the Accounting textbooks. Using them assists teachers of Accounting who have the responsibility to choose textbooks that would assist their students to make meaning of the subject matter. Three sections from each textbook were analysed: an introduction section on budgeting, analysis and interpretation section, and section on General Accepted Accounting Principles. These topics are very important in understanding the discipline of Accounting; their readability or accessibility by students play a crucial role in learning the subject of Accounting. The results showed that some textbooks are not readable, or are not straightforward and user friendly, and are thus difficult to understand and engage with. This points to these textbooks being challenging to some Accounting students, especially since to some English is their second language. The recommendations for future research are discussed. It is suggested that authors of Accounting textbooks must consider the readability of the textbooks.
Downloads
References
Adelberg, A. H., & Razek, J. R. (1984). The Cloze procedure: A methodology for determining the understandability of accounting textbooks. Accounting Review, volume(number), 109-122.
Apple, M. W. (2013). Teachers and texts: A political economy of class and gender relations in education: Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315862774 DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315862774
Bargate, K. (2012). The readability of managerial accounting and financial management textbooks. Meditari Accountancy Research, 20(1), 4-20. https://doi.org/10.1108/10222521211234192 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/10222521211234192
Chiang, W.-C., Englebrecht, T. D., Phillips Jr, T. J., & Wang, Y. (2008). Readability of financial accounting principles textbooks. The Accounting Educators' Journal, 18. https://doi.org/10.1016/0748-5751(92)90022-w
Crismore, A. (1981). Readability and the Black Box.
Dale, E., & Chall, J. S. (1949). The concept of readability. Elementary English, 26(1), 19-26.
David, R. (2012). An Exploration of the Ideology in Economic and Management Sciences Textbooks: A Critical Discourse Analysis. Unpublished Master’s thesis, University of KwaZulu-Natal, Durban.
Davidson, R. A. (2005). Analysis of the complexity of writing used in accounting textbooks over the past 100 years. Accounting Education, 14(1), 53-74. https://doi.org/10.1080/09639280410001695241 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/09639280410001695241
Dempster, E. R., & Reddy, V. (2007). Item readability and science achievement in TIMSS 2003 in South Africa. Science Education, 91(6), 906-925. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.20225 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.20225
Department of Basic Education. (2016). National Curriculum Statement (NCS) Curriculum and Assessment Policy Statement (CAPS) Further Education and Training Phase Grades 10-12: Accounting. Pretoria: Department of Basic Education.
DuBay, W. H. (2004). The Principles of Readability. Online Submission.
Flory, S. M., Phillips Jr, T. J., & Tassin, M. F. (1992). Measuring readability: A comparison of accounting textbooks. Journal of Accounting Education, 10(1), 151-161. https://doi.org/10.1016/0748-5751(92)90022-w DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/0748-5751(92)90022-W
Fru, N. R. (2012). Heritage in Contemporary Grade 10 South African History Textbooks: A Case Study. Unpublished Master’s thesis, University of KwaZulu-Natal, Edgewood.
Gecit, Y. (2010). The evaluation of high school Geography 9 and High School Geography 11 text books with some formulas of readability. Educational Sciences: Theory and Practice, 10(4), 2205-2220.
Gosselin, A. M., Le Maux, J., & Smaili, N. (2021). Readability of accounting disclosures: a comprehensive review and research agenda. Accounting Perspectives, 20(4), 543-581. https://doi.org/10.1111/1911-3838.12275 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/1911-3838.12275
Harmon-Jones, E., Barratt, E. S., & Wigg, C. (1997). Impulsiveness, aggression, reading, and the P300 of the event-related potential. Personality and individual Differences, 22(4), 439-445. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0191-8869(96)00235-8 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0191-8869(96)00235-8
Junjie, M., & Yingxin, M. (2022). The discussions of positivism and interpretivism. Online Submission, 4(1), 10-14. https://doi.org/10.36348/gajhss.2022.v04i01.002 DOI: https://doi.org/10.36348/gajhss.2022.v04i01.002
Kithinji, C., & Kass, N. E. (2010). Assessing the readability of non-English-language consent forms: The case of Kiswahili for research conducted in Kenya. IRB: Ethics and Human Research, 32(4), 10.
Loughran, T., & McDonald, B. (2014). Measuring readability in financial disclosures. Journal of Finance, 69(4), 1643-1671. https://doi.org/10.1111/jofi.12162 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/jofi.12162
Mack, L. (2010). The philosophical underpinnings of educational research. Polyglosia, 19, 5-11.
McCallum, D. R., & Peterson, J. L. (1982). Computer-based readability indexes. In Proceedings of the ACM'82 Conference. https://doi.org/10.1145/800174.809754 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1145/800174.809754
McNaught, C. M. (1994). Learning science at the interface between Zulu and English. Unpublished PhD thesis. University of KwaZulu-Natal, Pietermaritzburg.
Molepo, M. C. (2018). The impact of Information literacy training on academic achievement and success of the first year entering undergraduate students at Tshwane University of Technology, Polokwane campus library.
Najafi, F. (2010). The comparative study of the readability of Persian translation of English literary texts for children and literary texts written for them in Persian. Unpublished MA thesis. Azad University Tehran Central Branch, Iran.
O'Reilly-Bargate, K. (2008). An investigation of prescribed managerial accounting and finance textbooks used by B. Com accounting students at some universities in South Africa. Unpublished Master’s thesis. University of KwaZulu-Natal, Pietermaritzburg,
Park, Y. S., Konge, L., & Artino Jr, A. R. (2020). The positivism paradigm of research. Academic Medicine, 95(5), 690-694. https://doi.org/10.1097/acm.0000000000003093 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/ACM.0000000000003093
Plucinski, K. J. (2010). Readability of intermediate accounting textbooks. Academy of Educational Leadership Journal, 14(2), 49.
Plucinski, K. J. (2011). Readability of cost accounting textbooks. Business Education Innovation Journal, 3(1).
Plucinski, K. J., Olsavsky, J., & Hall, L. (2009). Readability of introductory financial and managerial accounting textbooks. Academy of Educational Leadership Journal, 13(4), 119.
Razek, J. R., Hosch, G. A., & Pearl, D. (1982). Readability of accounting textbooks. Journal of Business Education, 58(1), 23-26.
Richards, G., & van Staden, C. (2015). The readability impact of international financial reporting standards. Pacific Accounting Review, 27(3), 282-303. https://doi.org/10.1108/par-08-2013-0086 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/PAR-08-2013-0086
Sale, J. E., Lohfeld, L. H., & Brazil, K. (2002). Revisiting the quantitative-qualitative debate: Implications for mixed-methods research. Quality and Quantity, 36(1), 43-53. https://doi.org/10.1023/a:1014301607592 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1014301607592
Schultz, L. (2014). Readability Analysis of Programming Textbooks: Traditional Textbook or Trade Book? In Proceedings of the Information Systems Educators Conference. Retrieved from: https://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/document?repid=rep1&type=pdf&doi=ee8891fd6849fb331fe2d7d092257206a4581b75
Smith, J. E., & Smith, N. P. (1971). Readability: A measure of the performance of the communication function of financial reporting. Accounting Review, 46(3), 552-561.
Snyman, M. (2004). Using the printed medium to disseminate information about psychiatric disorders. African Journal of Psychiatry, 7(4), 15-20. https://doi.org/10.4314/ajpsy.v7i4.30174 DOI: https://doi.org/10.4314/ajpsy.v7i4.30174
Thakrar, J., Wolfenden, F., & Zinn, D. (2009). Harnessing open educational resources to the challenges of teacher education in Sub-Saharan Africa. International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 10(4). https://doi.org/10.19173/irrodl.v10i4.705 DOI: https://doi.org/10.19173/irrodl.v10i4.705
Tinkler, S., & Woods, J. (2013). The readability of principles of macroeconomics textbooks. Journal of Economic Education, 44(2), 178-191. https://doi.org/10.1080/00220485.2013.770345 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/00220485.2013.770345
Traugh, H. M., Powers, O. S., & Adedokun, A. J. (1987). Readability of accounting principles texts. Journal of Education for Business, 62(4), 159-162. https://doi.org/10.1080/08832323.1987.10772798 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/08832323.1987.10772798
Umoke, C., & Nwafor, C. E. (2015). Examination of the readability level of some approved science textbooks in use in junior secondary schools in Ebonyi State Of Nigeria. British Journal of Education, 3(11), 26-31 DOI: https://doi.org/10.14738/assrj.28.1365
Widyaningrum, L. (2014). Mapping readability of the texts and reading ability of the users. Retrieved from: https://core.ac.uk/download/pdf/45433907.pdf
Wissing, G. J., Blignaut, A. S., & Van den Berg, K. (2016). Using readability, comprehensibility and lexical coverage to evaluate the suitability of an introductory accountancy textbook to its readership. Stellenbosch Papers in Linguistics, 46, 155-179. https://doi.org/10.5774/46-0-205 DOI: https://doi.org/10.5774/46-0-205
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Sithembele Goodman Ndovela
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
For all articles published in IJRBS, copyright is retained by the authors. Articles are licensed under an open access Creative Commons CC BY 4.0 license, meaning that anyone may download and read the paper for free. In addition, the article may be reused and quoted provided that the original published version is cited. These conditions allow for maximum use and exposure of the work, while ensuring that the authors receive proper credit.
